![]() Like paying for support will solve a carte blanche install bug, though they could sure keep me busy trying to work around what I cannot fix. I have received my customer support file number and was moderately chagrined that they were additionally trying to sell me faster support services. That is just plain silly and extraordinarily amateurish by a company like Corel whose main competition is Adobe. (Bet you that R&D didn't use an AMD machine with Radeon graphics in testing). I haven't heard of something even close since the Netscape and Explorer wars of the 1990's. 3) installed upgrade fine on laptop, but unable to install cleanly on desktop (after using tab-enter) and bugs galore. How can a company make the same mistake in such a short time? I made sure I paid $99 this time, but I see that many have paid more. 2) this year, 2016 upgrade pricing involves the identical consumer misrepresentation as last year. I did receive a refund from $229 to $99 then, but it sure made me think about the marketing by the product manager. I'm not a pro, but a hobbyist of photography, computers, and the modern means towards achieving my now retired bliss.ģ things: 1) last year's conundrum with the upgrade pricing. ![]() As a user of Painter since Fractal Painter, the last 2 years of releases does not bode well for me remaining a part of the Painter customer base. If you are old enough, you have been disappointed before by great software that has been mismanaged and flung over the corporate abyss.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |